home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Light ROM 4
/
Light ROM 4 - Disc 1.iso
/
text
/
maillist
/
1994
/
oct94.doc
/
000316_owner-lightwave-l _Tue Oct 18 18:33:13 1994.msg
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
1995-03-23
|
2KB
Return-Path: <owner-lightwave-l>
Received: by netcom.netcom.com (8.6.9/Netcom)
id QAA19222; Tue, 18 Oct 1994 16:28:41 -0700
Received: from grouper by netcom.netcom.com (8.6.9/Netcom)
id QAA19098; Tue, 18 Oct 1994 16:28:31 -0700
Message-Id: <m0qxNyS-000A1jC@grouper>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 94 16:29 PDT
X-Sender: bblevins@moscow.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: lightwave-l@netcom.com
From: bblevins@moscow.com (Bryan Blevins)
Subject: Re: Lightwave for Windows
X-Mailer: <Windows Eudora Version 1.4.2b16>
Sender: owner-lightwave-l@netcom.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: lightwave-l@netcom.com
>OS?!?), I was wondering if getting Soft Windows to run LightWave under would
>be worth it. Or would it just be too slow and crash-prone to be worth
>trying.
>
>"Whaddya think, sirs?"
>--Brian Tatosky
>
LightWave for windows will require WIN32s, the 32bit libraries for Windows3.1.
Make sure that SoftWindows is supports WIN32s before you shell out the cash.
As far as rendering goes, my experience with software emulators is that they
are SLOW. Let me restate that more clearly... They are
SSSSSSLLLLLOOOOOWWWWW.....
LightWave wants the fastest processor you can afford, using a windows
emulator would be going in the opposite direction. (IMHO)
Bryan
+---------------------------+-------------------------------------------+
| Bryan J. Blevins | All I ask is a chance to prove that |
| bblevins@moscow.com | money can't make me happy. |
| Blevins Enterprises, Inc. | |
+---------------------------+-------------------------------------------+